Public Health Expert Criticises WHO's Tobacco Harm Reduction Stance
The Cochrane Library consistently shows that switching to these alternatives can dramatically reduce smoking-related risks, Olatunji said.
NAIROBI, Kenya— A public health expert has criticized the World Health Organization's stance on tobacco harm reduction, arguing that resistance to scientific evidence is impeding progress in reducing smoking-related health risks, writes Winston Mwale.
Uche Olatunji told international experts and delegates Tuesday that WHO's opposition to harm reduction strategies undermines potential life-saving alternatives for smokers.
He cited growing scientific evidence supporting safer nicotine products like vaping devices, snus, and heated tobacco products.
The Cochrane Library consistently shows that switching to these alternatives can dramatically reduce smoking-related risks, Olatunji said.
Countries like England have published draft guidelines recommending these products as part of comprehensive smoking reduction strategies.
"These findings often face resistance—not because the science is flawed, but because of deep-rooted ideologies and misinformation," Olatunji stated.
The expert outlined key recommendations for bridging the gap between scientific evidence and policy:
Ensure impartial decision-making based on peer-reviewed research
Engage diverse stakeholders, including scientists and consumers
Prioritize public education to counter misinformation
Olatunji highlighted that innovative nicotine products significantly reduce exposure to harmful chemicals compared to traditional cigarettes.
He urged policymakers to prioritize scientific research and collaborative approaches.
"Tobacco harm reduction offers a transformative opportunity to reduce smoking-related harms on a global scale," Olatunji concluded, calling for balanced regulations and ethical innovation.