Debate Rages Over Malawi's Anti-Graft Chief Appointment Process
The debate surrounds efforts to strengthen anti-graft efforts under President Lazarus Chakwera's administration amid concerns over corruption undermining development.
LILONGWE, Malawi - The procedure for appointing the director general of Malawi's Anti-Corruption Bureau is facing criticism, with some arguing presidential involvement undermines the fight against graft, writes Regina Kadzuwa.
According to the Corrupt Practices Act, the president appoints the director from a shortlist of up to three candidates recommended by the justice minister, subject to confirmation by the public appointments committee.
However, legal expert Justin Dzonzi believes this process creates a perception of favor that could hinder the office's independence against the president.
"While being appointed by the president out of three people, it could be seen as a favor. When it comes to questioning the president, that appointed person could not perform wholeheartedly," Dzonzi said.
Human rights activist Kelvin Chirwa of the Human Rights Defenders Coalition agreed the procedure "hinders the corruption fight since it's natural to protect those who do us favors."
But the Anti-Corruption Bureau's Egrita Ndala defended the system, stating the successful candidate earned the position through interviews, not favors.
She cited current director general Martha Chizuma's appointment as an example.
The debate surrounds efforts to strengthen anti-graft efforts under President Lazarus Chakwera's administration amid concerns over corruption undermining development.